From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar 19 06:25:58 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541071065672
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:25:58 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu)
Received: from mx1.bjare.net (mx1.bjare.net [212.31.160.3])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E8A8FC17
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:25:58 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEDF35E322
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:05:36 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx1.bjare.net
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.359
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.359 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.241, 
	BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
Received: from mx1.bjare.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (mx1.bjare.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with LMTP id d+RhUBlcJG2C for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:05:33 +0100 (CET)
X-BN-MX1: ja
X-BN-MailInfo: BjareNet
Received: from blj01.no-ip.org (c-195-216-040-164.static.bjare.net
	[195.216.40.164]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE96B5E126
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:05:33 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <49C1E0AD.1050705@eskk.nu>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:05:33 +0100
From: Leslie Jensen <leslie@eskk.nu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090127)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Question about ports....
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:25:58 -0000


I have a script that does

portsnap fetch update
pkg_version -vIL=

Lately I've seen the listing below


PySolFC-1.1                    !   Comparison failed
wine-1.1.16,1                  <   needs updating (index has 1.1.17,1)


My first question is: What is wrong when Comparison fails?


Second question is when I try to build wine it'll fail saying that port 
is marked IGNORE.

___________________

Port directory: /usr/ports/emulators/wine
         ===>>> This port is marked IGNORE
         ===>>> builds, but fails upon startup

         ===>>> If you are sure you can build it, remove the
                IGNORE line in the Makefile and try again.
____________________

If the port is marked IGNORE why is it listed as a new version. 
Logically I would think that a port marked IGNORE should not be listed 
as having a new version.


Thanks for you input

/Leslie