From owner-freebsd-current Wed May 14 10:25:16 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA21935 for current-outgoing; Wed, 14 May 1997 10:25:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eyelab.psy.msu.edu (eyelab.psy.msu.edu [35.8.64.179]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA21926 for ; Wed, 14 May 1997 10:25:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eyelab3.psy.msu.edu (eyelab3.psy.msu.edu [35.8.64.180]) by eyelab.psy.msu.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA13559 for ; Wed, 14 May 1997 13:21:37 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19970514132355.00707968@eyelab.msu.edu> X-Sender: root@eyelab.msu.edu X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (32) Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 13:23:55 -0400 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: Gary Schrock Subject: Re: RELENG_2_2 In-Reply-To: <19970514111926.DF34579@uriah.heep.sax.de> References: <7493.863510486@time.cdrom.com> <19970513071838.JT48650@uriah.heep.sax.de> <7493.863510486@time.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >> dtmail to be suid root?? What about things like popper? > >popper is _way_ smaller, basically intelligible, does not provide the >usual dangerous interfaces of MUAs (like spawning shells etc.). I can >live with 10 poppers being setuid root, if this saves me from an MUA >being set[ug]id at all. Umm, maybe I'm missing something, but: -rwxr-xr-x 1 root bin 32768 Mar 3 14:02 popper It doesn't look setuid on my machine, and as far as I can tell it's working perfectly fine. Gary Schrock root@eyelab.msu.edu