From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Nov 8 3: 7:22 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from iclub.nsu.ru (iclub.nsu.ru [193.124.222.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18BD37B4C5; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 03:07:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (fjoe@localhost) by iclub.nsu.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA63472; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:06:42 +0600 (NS) (envelope-from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:06:42 +0600 (NS) From: Max Khon To: "Koster, K.J." Cc: "'Doug Barton'" , "'FreeBSD Hackers mailing list'" Subject: RE: daemon() In-Reply-To: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D79C7@l04.research.kpn.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi, there! On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Koster, K.J. wrote: > > No one with any brains uses bash 1 for anything > > anymore. > Then why is it there? To help up the port count? If it's not good, it should > be nuked, IMHO. people still use it because it is smaller obrien has already tried to remove it once (in Mar 1999) as for me -- I do not try to hunt bugs in bash1 and do not blame it. my question was about unclosed pipe /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message