Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 14:14:42 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: root@mshslc.k12.mi.us (Rut0fAll3v1l) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ps, w Message-ID: <199601312114.OAA10622@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199601301845.SAA01637@mshslc.k12.mi.us> from "Rut0fAll3v1l" at Jan 30, 96 06:45:23 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
RutOfAll3vll writes: > I got the 960116 snapshot from freedffall > bah freefall...Anyways I needed some kernel sources to kmake > a new kernel so i got current as of jan 23. ps an d w broke > after that so i got current ps/w and they are still broken. I now > have a jan 30 kernel source tree which i haven't yet booted under > cuz i'm gettin irq/drq values for my soundblaster equipment which > i will put in the config file later.. but tha's not relavent.. > ps and w complain about the chunk size and so forth.. Dear Rut: 1) This is the wrong list for this. 2) When the proc structure changes, things which rely on the proc structure must be rebuilt (like devfs). 3) When things that rely on the proc structure are changed (like devfs), things that rely on them (like ps and w) must be rebuilt. 4) Same goes for routing code or any other kernel/user interface not mandated by POSIX and generally hidden in ioctl()'s (like routing) or under library interfaces (in which case the libraries need to be rebuilt, and the application using them statically need to be rebuilt). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601312114.OAA10622>