From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 26 00:02:33 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 68E2416A4BF; Tue, 26 Aug 2003 00:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7893943F93; Tue, 26 Aug 2003 00:02:32 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h7Q72VwN033977;
	Tue, 26 Aug 2003 01:02:31 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 01:02:30 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20030826.010230.56174806.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: ken@kdm.org
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030826053634.GA5646@panzer.kdm.org>
References: <20030825134756.P18344@root.org>
	<20030826002949.GA3136@panzer.kdm.org>
	<20030826053634.GA5646@panzer.kdm.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: stable@freebsd.org
cc: current@freebsd.org
cc: nate@root.org
Subject: Re: scsi-da does not work with INVARIANTS (fwd)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 07:02:33 -0000

In message: <20030826053634.GA5646@panzer.kdm.org>
            "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org> writes:
: If it is possible to create a task queue that uses a kernel thread instead,
: that might be a generally useful thing.  (And it might solve this
: particular issue.)

I'm not sure that a taskqueue can do this, but NEWCARD uses a kernel
thread to process pccard events and attach/detach devices for all the
reasons that have been outlined in the rest of this thread.

Warner