From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Mar 28 12:54: 1 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A25AD37BAC3; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 12:53:59 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ade@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from ade@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id MAA63485;
	Tue, 28 Mar 2000 12:53:59 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ade@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 12:53:59 -0800 (PST)
From: <ade@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200003282053.MAA63485@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: mi@aldan.algebra.com, ade@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/12722: New port: AT&T's DjVu library for scanned images
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Synopsis: New port: AT&T's DjVu library for scanned images

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: ade
State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 28 12:46:35 PST 2000
State-Changed-Why: 
I took a look at this.  It appears that the MASTER_SITE has
since moved to http://www.djvu.com/, the MD5 checksum has
changed.  In addition, the port does not appear to be ${PREFIX}-safe,
and needs to be reworked to use USE_NEWGCC

Finally, the port requires reading and accepting one of those
really long AT&T license agreements at post-extract stage, so
judicious use of IS_INTERACTIVE, NO_PACKAGE, NO_CDROM etc. will
be needed.

If you can provide new ports for this submission, and the related
one in ports/12739, then there should be no problem committing
them to the tree.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message