From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 19 02:05:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288F516A478 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 02:05:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@triforce.info) Received: from eagle.ibwd.com (ibwd.com [65.161.177.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE63D43D49 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 02:05:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@triforce.info) Received: from antonioh89t9q9 (c-67-184-171-127.hsd1.il.comcast.net [67.184.171.127]) by eagle.ibwd.com (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jAJ25JQw022186; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 20:05:20 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from freebsd@triforce.info) From: "Antonio Gandara" To: "'Bill Moran'" , "'Antonio Gandara'" Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 20:05:12 -0600 Message-ID: <001f01c5ecad$b091f520$8a0010ac@antonioh89t9q9> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <43885.162.51.212.16.1132281348.squirrel@www.potentialtech.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-index: AcXr6TR2TGbqUGenTEmN3KautK6kvAAxE3Hg Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: RST response in message log? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 02:05:22 -0000 Well that makes sense to me. Thanks for all your replies. Antonio -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Bill Moran Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 8:36 PM To: Antonio Gandara Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RST response in message log? Antonio Gandara wrote: > Hi, > > Just had a general question as to this message which appeared in the > message > log file and dmesg. While I understand it is reducing response to packets, > I > am perplexed as to what causes this to happen? I am running 4.11 Release. > > Nov 16 11:07:18 eagle /kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 300 > to > 200 packets per second While there are other things that could cause this, it's almost always indicative of a portscan. The RSTs are limited to prevent DoS attacks from generating overly huge amounts of traffic. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"