Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 23:32:51 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r367883 - in head: Mk lang/gcc Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1409102231390.2867@tuna.site> In-Reply-To: <5410AEB5.9050205@FreeBSD.org> References: <201409101909.s8AJ9wpY028698@svn.freebsd.org> <5410AEB5.9050205@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Bryan Drewery wrote: > Thanks for writing up a summary of changes. Very useful. I learned > about AddressSanitizer being supported. You are very welcome! (I haven't tested AddressSanitizer myself, but think I recall a positive report by a user. If it does not work properly we might look into lang/gcc49 or lang/gcc5.) On a related note, when trying to commit the PORTREVISION bump related to this commit, I ended up with: svn: E165001: Commit failed (details follow): svn: E165001: Commit blocked by pre-commit hook (exit code 1) with output: Do not commit ports with NOPORTDOCS or NOPORTEXAMPLES. The port must be converted to proper OPTIONS. See http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-options.html Not super helpful since it did not indicate which of the 1000+ ports actually failed this test. ;-) I could bypass this using Approved: portmgr (implicit). Gerald
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.LSU.2.11.1409102231390.2867>