Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:58:33 -0800 From: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> Cc: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@crodrigues.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: What broke with libtool upgrade? (devel/apr-svn) Message-ID: <FA02595D-FEE2-4ED5-9FCC-77B0F28B9E64@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20060228073854.716b85d8@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <20060228040930.GA52553@crodrigues.org> <DCC32FCD-C03D-4562-AACD-7E0A8FB815FA@FreeBSD.org> <20060228065036.0b3f2ae3@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <B6B3D504-8419-435B-9F90-2970A49ECDA8@FreeBSD.org> <20060228073854.716b85d8@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Feb 27, 2006, at 21:38 , Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > And, of course, I was scrathing my head looking in config* to > understand > why it picks bash and not sh. Heh. Excellent detective work nonetheless. > Changed all _three_ to CONFIGURE_ENV and it passed a make install :) Actually, I found _four_, changed them all to be on the safe side, and it still passes make install with/without ports/shells/bash installed. I've committed that change. There's definitely something[tm] going on with bash here. -aDe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FA02595D-FEE2-4ED5-9FCC-77B0F28B9E64>