From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 5 10:12:31 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2FF42E061F for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 10:12:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49GbBQ2gW0z3D97 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 10:12:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de ([94.222.9.16]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue106 [212.227.15.183]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 1N8XDT-1j0zkr11CD-014SZU; Tue, 05 May 2020 12:12:28 +0200 Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 12:12:27 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Nikita Stepanov Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which version of freebsd Is faster: amd64 or i386? Message-Id: <20200505121227.82020fc8.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4323681588671834@sas1-55829ddbd171.qloud-c.yandex.net> References: <4323681588671834@sas1-55829ddbd171.qloud-c.yandex.net> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:hzptdKFmtzETWMmfvCLyZOVexWUnMY5kCk4Xl3PGTZLMwTpF4Jq 8Cqu3TkwM77GohxwITe8chIBeZCyyKTtBdU0vyAoY84CChR0cUTiWSSoC9M3BVIdtUegDhv tOK5+W5EHlFLAlcMj2vu7NcUpOgLzMluGRjcvXAcLPHP2XRL3EjP5Kh7Ez3/AqsNzd+SHDX i9LS4lhyExY4seLtKWrAg== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:qxnMq3PGheY=:2v+5d/voaz7HidWJlb/rF3 DdrJcMVCTkgD2DAb7Xd8ZTrc2ksPrqg3ljwrL11gjlrA1XMa6X3QQJp0nA9oBOxGm5zpqNDLG Rk+jPu+h/cIeseriSnNtpbVb2GLA1CZlFeu16d9cjKSTGUNPAyqj8gfRGBnizTo2LKhwDKNCU +lkZ7gjYdPnc6/G8lmIT0G+xJSKyuhq2AhKSpd5ZyF2Ga3Qyk8+HKPT2jI3q6eRCgl6lRtj/z tXirYUFlQ3mO3QaLfCwYIpBSvlI+8Zap8GbpZiBWZkfwBswmZYKy6vBaF0QnUhIjWrKXVHgOA ooTX+OBlmcoYsi90//KvlzMFoMiKsq9WxBqYg2ugN+X1Zw9BMQLc8pQZF5E3v2qlbq0jbyJLg nfHgGeFkvnWOOWs7qC/5+RRmZOTSlgud7APTpz/qzGRJ2e4c0XkjN8AiNIIB2a19IISuHCyAQ S8ulC9x8rDiMKUxK8brQMvz8HAKkXYE3vX/zpYiervcdPAQgW/LdM0p2DPr4HtOj0l724/vgW cFENW65y6puTuLOKXFxC02mucVA2E3rPHmsXeZItGYqGbYO+dc0QuUMF3sdnjZPJLAJ963tKC yivgOa0m/OEdDGW6mqkAowCesL7QX/RB9mCRkz+Xr0gY4ZJfAObZOunN20ousIcaecF+/ifiS y1quBiGY/FATbu++qkEt023FC38omF1JUjo9E9NxLFAs3avhrDsvxj3YYWsAgPn2h1e9cF7pR mk4FUV5os4+qw7nZ1xNRbK9ONbGU8988uiH+ZrOcNruAig3NVg9r6MhnTpwA3jwXHGbCLKAH0 xg78H7f0whP2mB/DH+dS6qgpfATB07EL66l5eDepoCFov4Ban7PtFs4+fOb4xLbgs6fImjG X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49GbBQ2gW0z3D97 X-Spamd-Bar: +++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@edvax.de has no SPF policy when checking 212.227.17.13) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@edvax.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [5.07 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd@edvax.de]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[16.9.222.94.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[edvax.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.60)[0.596,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.99)[0.995,0]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[13.17.227.212.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[13.17.227.212.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(0.08)[ip: (-0.41), ipnet: 212.227.0.0/16(-1.20), asn: 8560(2.04), country: DE(-0.02)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 10:12:31 -0000 On Tue, 05 May 2020 15:43:54 +0600, Nikita Stepanov wrote: > [nothing] Depends. On a amd64-capable system, using i386 might be interesting because less RAM is needed; I don't know about execution speed of 32 bit code on a 64 bit CPU. If the system does not have more than approx. 4 GB, i386 won't reach the maximum amount of memory it can manage without PAE. So maybe on older 64 bit system it might actually be an advantage to use i386, as long as you don't need any specific software that's only available on amd64. On a i386-capable system, amd64 of course won't even work. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...