From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Apr 24 11:55: 4 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2B21537BB8D; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 11:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA14088;
	Mon, 24 Apr 2000 11:55:57 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>,
	phk@critter.freebsd.dk (Poul-Henning Kamp),
	freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: SMP changes and breaking kld object module compatibility 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 23 Apr 2000 23:17:51 PDT."
             <200004240617.XAA66270@apollo.backplane.com> 
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 11:55:57 -0700
Message-ID: <14085.956602557@zippy.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>     So you guys (core) choose -- do you want 4.x to reap the benefits of
>     further SMP development or not?

I've read all the feedback on this thread and now feel that it would
be worthwhile to simply bring the SMP changes in on Wednesday.  As others
have pointed out, we don't have enough 3rd party 4.0 klds yet (I'd have
a hard time even saying "any") to make this a real problem so let's
just go for it.

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message