Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 7 May 2003 13:30:17 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Diomidis Spinellis <dds@aueb.gr>
To:        freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:    Re: docs/51480: Multiple undefined references in the FreeBSD manual  pages
Message-ID:  <200305072030.h47KUH1t008309@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/51480; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Diomidis Spinellis <dds@aueb.gr>
To: jpb@sixshooter.v6.thrupoint.net
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, schweikh@schweikhardt.net,
	keramida@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: docs/51480: Multiple undefined references in the FreeBSD manual 
 pages
Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 23:27:18 +0300

 Jim Brown wrote:
 > Here is my cvsup file. I keep a local repo copy of
 > cvs-all and also gnats, updated every  daily.
 > 
 > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 > *default host=cvsup2.FreeBSD.org
 > *default base=/usr3/FreeBSD
 > *default prefix=/usr3/FreeBSD
 > *default release=cvs
 
 It looks like you are tracking HEAD, while my report was identifying
 STABLE (RELENG_4).  You would need to specify
 *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4
 to track STABLE.
 
 I verified one of the files you mentioned as existing against the cvs
 repository:
 
 bash-2.04$ cvs co -rRELENG_4 share/man/man9/vflush.9
 cvs server: share/man/man9/vflush.9 is no longer in the repository
 bash-2.04$ cvs co -rRELENG_3 share/man/man9/vflush.9
 cvs server: warning: new-born share/man/man9/vflush.9 has disappeared
 bash-2.04$ cvs co -rRELENG_4_6 share/man/man9/vflush.9
 cvs server: warning: new-born share/man/man9/vflush.9 has disappeared
 bash-2.04$ cvs co -rRELENG_4_8_0_RELEASE share/man/man9/vflush.9
 cvs server: warning: new-born share/man/man9/vflush.9 has disappeared
 bash-2.04$ cvs co -rRELENG_5_0 share/man/man9/vflush.9
 U share/man/man9/vflush.9
 bash-2.04$ cvs co -rHEAD share/man/man9/vflush.9
 U share/man/man9/vflush.9
 
 It looks like vflush(9) is only part of the 5 branch, but wrongly
 mentioned in the 4 branch.  I assume the explaination will be similar
 for the rest of the files.  Running chkman on the 5 tree will msot
 probably produce different results: some of the missing files will be
 there, and new orphan .Xr may exist.
 
 
 
 Diomidis



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200305072030.h47KUH1t008309>