Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 20:38:11 +0200 From: John Marino <freebsdml@marino.st> To: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com>, "ports@FreeBSD.org Ports" <ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: The vim port needs a refresh Message-ID: <51A3A813.1060908@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <20130527183620.5ff9d8b0@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <20130524212318.B967FE6739@smtp.hushmail.com> <20130527140609.3d3b9d23@gumby.homeunix.com> <444ndofstn.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20130527153440.020ab20e@gumby.homeunix.com> <51A3798C.9000004@marino.st> <20130527173633.0e196a08@gumby.homeunix.com> <51A38D87.8070102@marino.st> <20130527183620.5ff9d8b0@gumby.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/27/2013 19:36, RW wrote: > On Mon, 27 May 2013 18:44:55 +0200 > John Marino wrote: > > > >> Great. With the previous mirror I had it would have taken well over >> an hour back when the patch count was 700. > > By default it should be the same mirror if you tested it this year. > Slow and dead mirrors were removed at the beginning of January. > > And you still haven't said whether you have any make.conf settings that > affect the order. I didn't change any settings. It may have been an FTP site rather than an HTTP site. I seem to recall some work to move HTTP over FTP fairly recently. > >> It's obviously true since multiple users are seeing it. (the whole >> 1080 movie analogy, remember?) > > It not obviously true that you aren't all either making this problem > with your make.conf settings or referring to a problem that existed last > year. It was THIS year and it wasn't that long ago. January in the worst case. But now you're explicitly telling multiple users that they didn't in fact experience this?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51A3A813.1060908>