From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Sep 21 23:25:17 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA00344 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Mon, 21 Sep 1998 23:25:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from main.piter.net (main.piter.net [195.201.22.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA00311 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 1998 23:25:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cyril@main.piter.net) Received: (from cyril@localhost) by main.piter.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA25428; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 10:22:11 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from cyril) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 10:22:11 +0400 (MSD) From: "Cyril A. Vechera" Message-Id: <199809220622.KAA25428@main.piter.net> To: ark@eltex.ru, winter@jurai.net Subject: Re: Packet/traffic shapper ? Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, ipfilter@postbox.anu.edu.au, oppermann@pipeline.ch Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > From: "Matthew N. Dodd" > > Ok, it patches _all_ network interface drivers instead of working with > > ip-level modules.. I definitely _do_not_want_ a thing like this to be > > in my kernel.. > > It must suck not wanting BPF in your kernel. :) I'm not sure how you live > with yourself. > > Any sort of intrusive features like ALTQ will require intrusive code to > implement them. > > How else would you suggest this sort of thing be handled? > > (Hint, dummynet appears to require device driver modification to work.) hmm, is there any opinions about ipltd? Sincerely, To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message