From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb 14 13:59:32 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC5C16A418;
	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:59:32 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from csaba@beastie.creo.hu)
Received: from beastie.creo.hu (www.creo.hu [217.113.62.14])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB0813C46E;
	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:59:31 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from csaba@beastie.creo.hu)
Received: from beastie.creo.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by beastie.creo.hu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m1EDvZPt023709
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:57:35 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from csaba@beastie.creo.hu)
Received: (from csaba@localhost)
	by beastie.creo.hu (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id m1EDvW46023708;
	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:57:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from csaba)
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:57:32 +0100
From: Csaba Henk <csaba-ml@creo.hu>
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@des.no>
Message-ID: <20080214135732.GF49155@beastie.creo.hu>
References: <3bbf2fe10802061700p253e68b8s704deb3e5e4ad086@mail.gmail.com>
	<70e8236f0802070321n9097d3fy1b39f637b3c2a06@mail.gmail.com>
	<slrnfqrp6g.i6j.csaba-ml@beastie.creo.hu>
	<867ihdc34c.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<20080212190207.GB49155@beastie.creo.hu>
	<86d4r2540f.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<20080213165923.GD49155@beastie.creo.hu>
	<86zlu493ep.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<20080214101511.GE49155@beastie.creo.hu>
	<86d4qzlnwf.fsf@ds4.des.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <86d4qzlnwf.fsf@ds4.des.no>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2
	(beastie.creo.hu [127.0.0.1]);
	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:57:35 +0100 (CET)
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove NTFS kernel support
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:59:32 -0000

On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 01:32:00PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Csaba Henk <csaba-ml@creo.hu> writes:
> > Regarding your assumption: I think it's not true. The only thing that
> > the lib and the module have in common is the header fuse_kernel.h which
> > defines the data structures and constants used in the kernel/userspace
> > protocol.
> 
> If those data structures and constants change, the port would have to
> deal with supporting multiple FreeBSD versions simultaneously.

No -- that's what the negotiation thingy is for. It's not a problem if
the kld and the lib were compiled with different revisions of that
header.

Csaba