From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Apr 1 12:16:32 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA23438 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 1 Apr 1996 12:16:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from lserver.infoworld.com (lserver.infoworld.com [192.216.48.4]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA23411 Mon, 1 Apr 1996 12:16:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from ccgate.infoworld.com by lserver.infoworld.com with smtp (Smail3.1.29.1 #12) id m0u3qNR-000wsdC; Mon, 1 Apr 96 12:39 PST Received: from cc:Mail by ccgate.infoworld.com id AA828389720; Mon, 01 Apr 96 12:50:46 PST Date: Mon, 01 Apr 96 12:50:46 PST From: "Brett Glass" Message-Id: <9603018283.AA828389720@ccgate.infoworld.com> To: "JULIAN Elischer" Cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org, bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Changes to FreeBSD kernel to keep "green" drives on Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > My laptop has always beed set up to timeout the drive after 30 secons.. > the system has been coping wth this successfully since 386BSD0.1 (1992). > the drive takes about 1.5 seconds to spin-up... > the standard timeoutes in the driver seem to cope.. Apparently, it depends on just how long the drive takes to come up to speed. It takes less power if it can ramp up more slowly, so the "greenest" drives will have the worst problems. --Brett