Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 2 Jun 2017 12:50:39 -0500
From:      Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
To:        Tim Gustafson <tjg@ucsc.edu>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Excluding File Systems from 100.chksetuid and 110.neggrpperm
Message-ID:  <CA+tpaK209YqTu8B-eH4k=-LgZ6wugkzRjGFNfPCu_on49wwzGw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPyBAS7WN91CCxB15xpf_C7XEdv9T=DG-W7GjTx0Vy7s5Fx9gQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAPyBAS7WN91CCxB15xpf_C7XEdv9T=DG-W7GjTx0Vy7s5Fx9gQ@mail.gmail.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Tim Gustafson <tjg@ucsc.edu> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We have several FreeBSD 10.x and 11.x servers that host about 150TB of
> ZFS file systems each.
>
> Each day, the 100.chksetuid and 110.neggrpperm run against our entire
> data set, which has hundreds of millions of files in it, and winds up
> slowing everything down and using up all our resources.
>
> Looking at those scripts, they don't seem to take any parameters, and
> I can't configure them to exclude certain folders that really just
> don't need to be scanned.  I did find this post which suggested a
> patch for FreeBSD 9.x, but it does not appear to have even been
> implemented:
>
> https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/31846/
>
> Is there any hope of getting these options added?
>

That thread mentions this posting which contains responses as to why it
likely was never pursued further:

https://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=275969+0+/usr/local/www/mailindex/archive/2012/freebsd-stable/20120506.freebsd-stable

-- 
Adam



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA+tpaK209YqTu8B-eH4k=-LgZ6wugkzRjGFNfPCu_on49wwzGw>