From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 22 23:50:51 2009
Return-Path: <owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916A41065713;
	Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:50:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org)
From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:50:36 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <200901221706.n0MH6XN1017768@svn.freebsd.org>
	<200901221536.19137.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
	<4978FC49.9080806@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4978FC49.9080806@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200901221850.37708.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org,
	src-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: svn: head/sys: compat/linprocfs i386/cpufreq
X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for &quot;
	user&quot; and &quot; projects&quot; \)" <svn-src-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all>,
	<mailto:svn-src-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-src-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-src-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all>,
	<mailto:svn-src-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:50:51 -0000

On Thursday 22 January 2009 06:07 pm, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 January 2009 03:24 pm, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> >> Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> >>> Author: jkim
> >>> Date: Thu Jan 22 17:06:33 2009
> >>> New Revision: 187594
> >>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/187594
> >>>
> >>> Log:
> >>>   Replace couple of strcmp(cpu_vendor, "foo") with
> >>> cpu_vendor_id for i386
> >>
> >> What about amd64?
> >
> > It is #ifdef'ed out in linprocfs.c and smist.c is i386-specific,
> > i.e., it does not compile on amd64.
>
> No, it's not. The function linprocfs_docpuinfo() are the same for
> both amd64 and i386, so that you've just broken it for amd64 with
> this commit.

#ifdef was added with it:

http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200901221706.n0MH6XN1017768

Jung-uk Kim