Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 11:45:24 +0100 From: Paul Richards <paul@freebsd-services.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/lnc if_lnc.c Message-ID: <20030722104524.GA80471@survey.codeburst.net> In-Reply-To: <200307220922.h6M9M0YQ062963@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200307220922.h6M9M0YQ062963@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 02:22:00AM -0700, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > phk 2003/07/22 02:22:00 PDT > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > sys/dev/lnc if_lnc.c > Log: > Don't inline ridiculously very large functions. > > Compared to the contents of these functions, an extra function call > is nano-peanuts. Both of those functions were called from just one place, inside the interrupt handler. Is there any reason to not inline them? -- Tis a wise thing to know what is wanted, wiser still to know when it has been achieved and wisest of all to know when it is unachievable for then striving is folly. [Magician]
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030722104524.GA80471>