From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 10 02:57:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03E516A4CE for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 02:57:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.lphp.org (APastourelles-107-1-3-28.w193-251.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.53.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 784F443FDF for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 02:57:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ajacoutot@lphp.org) Received: from compaq (lyon-3-62-147-49-95.dial.proxad.net [62.147.49.95]) by mail.lphp.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id hAAAtZpQ002308; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:55:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ajacoutot@lphp.org) Message-ID: <000601c3a779$6d3a8920$5f31933e@compaq> From: "Antoine Jacoutot" To: "Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr." References: <200311081202.05221.ajacoutot@lphp.org> <20031108155605.P4863@mail.allcaps.org> Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 12:49:32 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rpc.lockd core dumped X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 10:57:39 -0000 > Check to make sure that rpc.statd is running. There was an old bug that > rpc.lockd would dump core if it couldn't find a statd. Ho, it is running :) Actually, all my homedir are mounted with NFS, so rpc.lockd get used a lot. That is why it is an important concern to me. I couldn't find any repeatable behaviour that would make rpc.lockd crashes. Sometimes, it will crash when I launch an application, sometime, it will just crash after 30 minutes of inactivities on my client... The server is running CURRENT and the clients are running 5.1-p10. I know it is not a very stable/secure configuration, but it is done on purpuse of testing the new functionnalities under a semi-production environment. Antoine