Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:21:20 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Johannes Jost Meixner <xmj@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r377721 - in head/devel/newfile: . files Message-ID: <20150123122120.GA91455@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <54C234F6.4070805@FreeBSD.org> References: <201501231039.t0NAdYS5095664@svn.freebsd.org> <20150123110243.GA64051@FreeBSD.org> <54C234F6.4070805@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:48:06PM +1100, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 23/01/2015 10:02 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > TBH, we should have never allowed to have dotted port names in the first > > place. It already caused problems with e.g. ".core"-suffixed ports that > > had to be renamed or something like that in the past. I think it's quite > > clear that using dot in names is asking for trouble (and such names look > > plain ugly), but people just can't refrain from using dot. :-( Maybe it > > is some kind of mental disorder similar to incomprehensible predilection > > some people exhibit to Comic Sans font. > > Blame me, I asked for it. POLA violation when I ran port create. It > created py-gandi > > https://pypi.python.org/pypi/gandi.cli It would all be much easier if those dotted ports were s/\./-/g prior to adding them. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150123122120.GA91455>