Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 02:39:42 -0500 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS-UP new statfs structure Message-ID: <p06002019bbdcc222bbb8@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20031116002004.J10222-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> References: <20031116002004.J10222-100000@mail.chesapeake.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 12:21 AM -0500 11/16/03, Jeff Roberson wrote: >On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > > Or maybe the real problem is that we claim that there will > > be no API/ABI changes after X.0-RELEASE, and we've really >> missed that mark with 5.0-RELEASE, for a variety of reasons. >> If we're going to keep missing that mark with the 6.x-series, >> then we should plan to do something to make life a little > > less painful. > >The API and ABI are frozen when we make 5.x-STABLE and >branch 6.x. Until then it's open to change. This was >decided up front. Hmm, Yes it was. I was mixing up the time of X.0-RELEASE and making the branch for <X+1>-current. Good point. Please note that I'm not unhappy with any of these changes. I think they're all very good to get in. But we do have hundreds of developers trying to track -current, and I think we'd get some productivity boost whenever we can make these changes a little smoother. As I mentioned earlier, it's only going to get worse as we have more developers trying to contribute. Developers that we *do* want to be tracking -current... <aside> And to mention just one change that I'm particularly happy with, the change so a single kernel works on both SMP and single-processor systems has already saved me some grief. My hardware problems were (temporarily) solved by replacing my dual-CPU board with a single-CPU one. I'd be in even more pain today if it wasn't for that change! I still haven't figured out what I'll do with the 4.9-stable system on this machine... [disclaimer: today has been a long day for me, all spent rebuilding freebsd systems from this hardware headache. I just now finished successfully upgrading the last 5.x system I have (it just booted up as I am typing this). So don't mind me too much...] </aside> -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p06002019bbdcc222bbb8>