From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 9 15:28:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 534E016A41F for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 15:28:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F164843D45 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 15:28:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.48.2]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3612EBC6D; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 15:28:43 +0000 (UTC) To: Craig Rodrigues From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 09 Oct 2005 11:21:45 EDT." <20051009152145.GA7180@crodrigues.org> Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 17:28:43 +0200 Message-ID: <9373.1128871723@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Teaching mount(8) to use nmount() X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 15:28:46 -0000 In message <20051009152145.GA7180@crodrigues.org>, Craig Rodrigues writes: >Hi, > >By the way, one side benefit of adding nmount() to mount(8) >is that we can eliminate unnecessary >mount_* binaries from /rescue and free up space. >For example, on my system: You're not going to save much if anything on that. Hint: try "ls -li /rescue" -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.