Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 12:06:36 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Matthew Hunt <mph@astro.caltech.edu> Cc: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, security-officer@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: New exploit ? Patch ? (from BUGTRAQ Aug26 1999) Message-ID: <199908261806.MAA66446@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 26 Aug 1999 11:03:01 PDT." <19990826110301.A3048@wopr.caltech.edu> References: <19990826110301.A3048@wopr.caltech.edu> <3.0.5.32.19990826125500.01d258a0@staff.sentex.ca> <199908261733.LAA65999@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <19990826110301.A3048@wopr.caltech.edu> Matthew Hunt writes: : On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 11:33:30AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: : : > #!/bin/sh : > limits -c 0 : > /usr/sbin/periodic.bin $* : : I believe "limits" should read "ulimit". "limits" is /usr/bin/limits, : and "ulimit" is the /bin/sh builtin. : : wopr:~$ cat blah : #!/bin/sh : limits -c 0 : limits : ulimit -c 0 : limits i do believe that you are right. That's what I get for whipping out a test case w/o testing it completely... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199908261806.MAA66446>