Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2000 14:56:03 -0500 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@emsphone.com> To: John Galt <galt@inconnu.isu.edu> Cc: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>, rob <europax@home.com>, Johannes Zwart <johannes@jak.nl>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why not XEmacs, after all? Message-ID: <20000902145603.A28852@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009021339300.22061-100000@inconnu.isu.edu>; from "John Galt" on Sat Sep 2 13:46:56 GMT 2000 References: <20000902142354.A20066@dan.emsphone.com> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009021339300.22061-100000@inconnu.isu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Sep 02), John Galt said: > Bullmerde! 4.0 pulled a week ago from ftp install, on a brand new > machine. cd /usr/ports/lynx;make install I get a error stating that > lynx has a few security holes in it. It's deprecated. Why in the world are you installing 4.0 instead of 4.1? 4.0 was released in March, and back then, lynx _was_ insecure, so the ports tree that came with 4.0 had it marked as insecure. The bugs have long since been fixed, and if you would update your ports tree, either with cvsup or by going to http://www.freebsd.org/ports, you would notice that it's no longer marked FORBIDDEN. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@emsphone.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000902145603.A28852>