From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 21 07:26:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E6B16A4CE for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 07:26:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8302443D58 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 07:26:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 547291FF9AC; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:26:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 7D7781FF9AB; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:26:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix, from userid 1060) id 14F03156C2; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 07:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 124BE15682; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 07:26:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 07:26:02 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net To: Vladimir Terziev In-Reply-To: <20041021100845.4ae38f61@daemon.cmotd.com> Message-ID: References: <20041019180042.553c1af0@daemon.cmotd.com> <20041019163128.GA1201@grosbein.pp.ru> <20041021100845.4ae38f61@daemon.cmotd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Quagga & ripd difficulty X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 07:26:23 -0000 On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Vladimir Terziev wrote: > On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:16:50 +0000 (UTC) > "Bjoern A. Zeeb" wrote: > > > use sth like > > device tun1; > > in your vtun config. > > > > PS: vtun is not secure ! > > Why do you think vtun is not secure ? Peter Gutman wrote a nice article about vtun (and others) for a german magazin about that [1]. I am unsure if the linux_vpn.txt is the same as the article but it may at least give a good overview/introduction. The english version of the article seems to be online[2] btw. [1] see http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/ /Analysis of some problems in Linux VPN implementations.*/ [2] http://www.linux-magazine.com/issue/39/VPN_Insecurity.pdf -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT