From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 22 17:50:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC1416A41F for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:50:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC0F43D53 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:50:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBMHo6r2007606 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:50:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jBMHo6XL007605; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:50:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:50:06 GMT Message-Id: <200512221750.jBMHo6XL007605@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Jean Milanez Melo Cc: Subject: Re: ports/90809: Update port: graphics/libfpx update to 1.2.0.13 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jean Milanez Melo List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:50:07 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/90809; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jean Milanez Melo To: Mikhail Teterin Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/90809: Update port: graphics/libfpx update to 1.2.0.13 Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 15:44:45 -0200 Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Jean! > > Although ImageMagick claims to "maintain" the software, their primary > intention seems to one-up the GraphicsMagick people, who don't maintain it > either. > > Last I checked, the only changes in the "releases" from them was in the > (auto-generated) configure/libtool glue, which the port is not using anyway. > > If you'd like, you can investigate and fix the 64-bit bugs (it crashes on > amd64, for example) in the code and, possibly, teach it to handle some > FPX-features, that it currently can't. > > Otherwise, let's leave the port alone until a relase, which changes a C or C++ > source file shows up. > > Thank you for your efforts, > > -mi Hi Mikhail. Oks, but if it crashes on amd64, i think we should mark this port as broken on amd64 until it be fixed. Do you agree? -- Atenciosamente Jean Milanez Melo FreeBSD Brasil LTDA. Fone: (31) 3281-9633 http://www.freebsdbrasil.com.br