Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 7 May 1999 16:43:29 -0700
From:      "David Schwartz" <>
To:        "David Knapp" <>
Cc:        <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   RE: Stability concerns in latest -STABLEs.
Message-ID:  <000001be98e3$68b4cc70$>
In-Reply-To: <>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help

	Theoretically, STABLE should be better, since it will have bugs fixed after
the release. In reality, though, it doesn't always work that way.


> I'm a newbie, so maybe I don't understand, but why not go with 3.1
> RELEASE?  Shouldn't it be more stable or as stable as 3.1-STABLE?
> dbk

To Unsubscribe: send mail to
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <$68b4cc70$021d85d1>