Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 7 May 1999 16:43:29 -0700
From:      "David Schwartz" <davids@webmaster.com>
To:        "David Knapp" <dknapp@luciamar.k12.ca.us>
Cc:        <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   RE: Stability concerns in latest -STABLEs.
Message-ID:  <000001be98e3$68b4cc70$021d85d1@whenever.youwant.to>
In-Reply-To: <37337A30.2DF8756@luciamar.k12.ca.us>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help

	Theoretically, STABLE should be better, since it will have bugs fixed after
the release. In reality, though, it doesn't always work that way.

	DS

> I'm a newbie, so maybe I don't understand, but why not go with 3.1
> RELEASE?  Shouldn't it be more stable or as stable as 3.1-STABLE?
>
> dbk



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000001be98e3$68b4cc70$021d85d1>