From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 15:18:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164E016A4E2 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:18:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A58943D55 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:18:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199E220A6; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:18:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F6B20A5; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:18:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6285033C24; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:18:39 +0200 (CEST) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: "Michael Bushkov" References: <44E9582C.2010400@rsu.ru> <44EAA213.6010507@delphij.net> <002901c6c5ba$628b67d0$9800a8c0@carrera> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:18:39 +0200 In-Reply-To: <002901c6c5ba$628b67d0$9800a8c0@carrera> (Michael Bushkov's message of "Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:12:40 +0400") Message-ID: <86hd0423zk.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, LI Xin Subject: Re: [HEADS UP]: OpenLDAP+nss_ldap+nss_modules separated patch and more (SoC) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:18:56 -0000 "Michael Bushkov" writes: > Li Xin wrote: > > Would you please consider having the imported OpenLDAP to install > > shared objects under alternative names? It might be painful for > > users who wants OpenLDAP installation from the ports collection > > (as OpenLDAP team moves fast and fixes bug from time to time) if > > they get a same library in /usr/lib... > I've been thinking about that. Would names like "libldap_i.so" and > "liblber_i.so" be ok ("_i" means "imported", or "internal")? Please don't. If somebody isn't happy with the base system's libldap, they can add WITHOUT_LDAP to their make.conf. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no