From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Nov 16 19:43:26 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mail.HiWAAY.net (fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A15714C5A for ; Tue, 16 Nov 1999 19:43:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net) Received: from nospam.hiwaay.net (tnt8-216-180-15-61.dialup.HiWAAY.net [216.180.15.61]) by mail.HiWAAY.net (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id VAA21041; Tue, 16 Nov 1999 21:43:20 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nospam.hiwaay.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA17830; Tue, 16 Nov 1999 21:43:18 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net) Message-Id: <199911170343.VAA17830@nospam.hiwaay.net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Terry Lambert Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG From: David Kelly Subject: Re: Judge: "Gates Was Main Culprit" In-reply-to: Message from Terry Lambert of "Wed, 17 Nov 1999 03:14:23 GMT." <199911170314.UAA06918@usr08.primenet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 21:43:18 -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Terry Lambert writes: > You can be damn sure that if your cable plant came up for lease > every two years, it would be maintained in such a way as to make > at least 51% of the voting population happy with how it was > being maintained. But if we have two choices for cable then the cable plant has to target 90% or better satisfaction. Else do the MS thing and somehow rope the customers into incompatible HDTV. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@hiwaay.net ===================================================================== The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message