Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 14:20:09 -0500 From: "George Neville-Neil" <gnn@neville-neil.com> To: "Jan Beich" <jbeich@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-dtrace@freebsd.org, freebsd-gecko@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: DTrace issues? Message-ID: <651933A1-6E29-4CD4-93E9-16FC380BE091@neville-neil.com> In-Reply-To: <20170212191826.5599A45EA@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <20170212191826.5599A45EA@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12 Feb 2017, at 14:18, Jan Beich wrote: > "George Neville-Neil" <gnn@neville-neil.com> writes: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm told that the reason we don't have a firefox package is due to >> DTrace. > > "firefox" package was masked on 12.0-CURRENT for 1 week due 2 > regressions > since then fixed. Other FreeBSD release are unaffected. > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/313504 > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/433889 > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/433904 > >> If so, please point me at active bugs in this area. > > Firefox is affected by a few more DTrace issues but those are old and > have been worked around in the ports tree. > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214556 # dtrace on > aarch64 > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1041353 # dtrace vs. > ld.gold > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702179 # dtrace vs. > static libs OK, thanks! Best, George
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?651933A1-6E29-4CD4-93E9-16FC380BE091>