Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 3 Jul 2006 11:27:37 +0200
From:      Paolo Pisati <p.pisati@oltrelinux.com>
To:        Vini Engel <vini@fugspbr.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD_Ipfw <freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: [6.x patchset] Ipfw nat and libalias modules
Message-ID:  <20060703092737.GA2387@tin.it>
In-Reply-To: <44A7E96C.3040200@fugspbr.org>
References:  <20060514220549.GA721@tin.it> <44A7E96C.3040200@fugspbr.org>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 01:42:36AM +1000, Vini Engel wrote:
> Paolo Pisati said the following on 15/05/06 08:05:
> > Released a new revision of my libalias+ipfw work as a 
> > patchset for 6.x, get it here: 
> > http://mercurio.srv.dsi.unimi.it/~pisati/libalias/libalias-6.x.tgz
> > 
> > fixed the checksum corruption occurring to redirected/generated traffic 
> > to/by a local interface on the nat box.
> > 
> > For more info:
> > http://wikitest.freebsd.org/moin.cgi/PaoloPisati
> 
> Hi guys,
> 
> I was wondering how stable this is at the moment? I am very keen on
> using it on my production box(es) but would like to hear someone else's
> experience first.

i know there're people using it on their productions boxes and i 
didn't hear anyone complaining, so i assume the code is stable.


BTW i just started to cleanup my patch for HEAD, but it'll take
a bit before i finish everything, so fell free to use the previous
patch.

bye
-- 

Paolo

Piso's first law: nothing works as expected!



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060703092737.GA2387>