Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 15 Apr 1995 16:33:50 +0200 (MET DST)
From:      J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de>
To:        mark@grondar.za (Mark Murray)
Cc:        bugs@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: xdvi is hosed.
Message-ID:  <199504151433.QAA04740@uriah.heep.sax.de>
In-Reply-To: <199504151129.NAA09007@grunt.grondar.za> from "Mark Murray" at Apr 15, 95 01:29:56 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Mark Murray wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> Subject line says it all. If I go in (after make configure) and manually
> edit the xdvi: target to include '-lXt -lXaw -lX11' it looks a whole lot
> better, except that two of its own symbols are not found at link time.

I'm the last one who's put his fingers on this port. :-/

Mysterious.  When i've tried it here before commiting (and also on
thud after commiting) it was compilable.  I could swear it. :)

Ok.  This whole Makefile/Imakefile crud there is too weird.  The most
terrible Imakefile i've ever seen. :-(

They do only rely on gmake since gmake continues if it cannot find an
include file (while bmake would bail out), and the Makefile is used to
generate an include file for the Makefile.  Strange abuse.

Anyway, i give up and apologize.  Gonna back out my changes... :-(
-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504151433.QAA04740>