From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Jan 18 20:03:24 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA19699 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sun, 18 Jan 1998 20:03:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id UAA19690 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 1998 20:03:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@village.org) Received: from harmony [10.0.0.6] by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 1.71 #1) id 0xu8Qf-0002Kg-00; Sun, 18 Jan 1998 21:03:17 -0700 Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.8.8/8.8.3) with ESMTP id VAA02286; Sun, 18 Jan 1998 21:03:16 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199801190403.VAA02286@harmony.village.org> To: John Fieber Subject: Re: Docs for bsd.ports.mk Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 18 Jan 1998 22:31:55 EST." References: Date: Sun, 18 Jan 1998 21:03:16 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message John Fieber writes: : You mean beyond what www.freebsd.org/handbook/porting.html : provides? Yes. Right now the porting.html talks about writing a port. It is excellent for writing a port. However, there are many dirty tricks that have been used for building ports. The NOCLEANDEPENDS question I just had, for example. Also things like PREFIX and alternative FETCH_CMDs and the like would be good to have as well. Warner