Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:36:25 -0800
From:      Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
To:        =?utf-8?Q?Radek_Krej=C4=8Da?= <radek.krejca@starnet.cz>
Cc:        "questions@freebsd.org" <questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: ntpd crashes during start - a lot of interfaces
Message-ID:  <F7EA7068-3851-4321-96F1-C55EDAE2FEB0@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <B2E0472020754D45B72E9B0CE35278CA90C4D186C4@EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz>
References:  <B2E0472020754D45B72E9B0CE35278CA90C4D186C4@EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Feb 5, 2012, at 10:39 PM, Radek Krej=E8a wrote:
> I have problem with using ntpd on 8.2 amd64 (not tested elsewhere). If =
I have a lot of interfaces (vlans) ntpd crashes with segmentation fault =
(core dump). I have tested on my test machine and it really depends on =
number of interfaces. It try to bind on every of it.
>=20
> I want to reduce it with using some options (like -I em0) but it seems =
that ntpd ignore it. If I use truss the system calls look same.
>=20
> Is there any way to bind directly on specified interface?

-I is supposed to do that, but if it doesn't work right, consider =
gaining a bit more debugging info (a backtrace from running under gdb or =
against the corefile) and filing a PR.  You could also discuss this with =
"upstream", meaning the NTP mailing list at =
<questions@lists.ntp.org>....

Regards,
--=20
-Chuck




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F7EA7068-3851-4321-96F1-C55EDAE2FEB0>