From owner-freebsd-smp Fri Jan 17 20:41:27 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id UAA20706 for smp-outgoing; Fri, 17 Jan 1997 20:41:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from housing1.stucen.gatech.edu (ken@housing1.stucen.gatech.edu [130.207.52.71]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id UAA20699; Fri, 17 Jan 1997 20:41:17 -0800 (PST) Received: (from ken@localhost) by housing1.stucen.gatech.edu (8.8.4/8.8.4) id XAA06172; Fri, 17 Jan 1997 23:41:04 -0500 (EST) From: Kenneth Merry Message-Id: <199701180441.XAA06172@housing1.stucen.gatech.edu> Subject: Re: Adaptec 3940UW and SMP In-Reply-To: <199701172158.OAA20041@clem.systemsix.com> from Steve Passe at "Jan 17, 97 02:58:23 pm" To: smp@csn.net (Steve Passe) Date: Fri, 17 Jan 1997 23:41:03 -0500 (EST) Cc: se@freebsd.org, smp@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL25 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Steve Passe wrote... > STefan wrote: > > I still think there is a problem with the installation > > of the shared PCI interrupt handler, if I read the log > > messages corerctly. > > I tend to agree, and we would want to ask Kenneth Merry to run tests of that > for > us as his system now works with the 3940 in all other respects. By this I mean > I believe he can now run the SMP kernel with APIC_IO enabled, and the 3940 > booting the system properly. Yeah, things work fine with the APIC_IO kernel, or at least it boots on the 3940 the system comes up normally, etc... I haven't really flogged it with APIC_IO enabled. (since X only runs without it enabled) Just let me know if there are any tests you want me to run and I'll give 'em a try. Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@ulc199.residence.gatech.edu Disclaimer: I don't speak for GTRI, GT, or Elvis.