Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:38:01 -0600
From:      Tillman Hodgson <tillman@seekingfire.com>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: HEADS UP: named now runs chroot'ed by default
Message-ID:  <20040930153801.GP35869@seekingfire.com>
In-Reply-To: <43039.193.35.129.161.1096541075.squirrel@webmail.xtaz.net>
References:  <20040928025635.Q5094@ync.qbhto.arg> <200409291951.12610.peter@wemm.org> <20040930033351.M57326@ync.qbhto.arg> <43039.193.35.129.161.1096541075.squirrel@webmail.xtaz.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 11:44:35AM +0100, Matt Smith wrote:
> Another quick question about this. I run the ports version of bind9
> however I still leave all the base stuff installed during installworld as
> one day I might want to use it. All I do is add the following in rc.conf:
> 
> named_enable="YES"
> named_program="/usr/local/sbin/named"
> named_flags="-c /usr/local/etc/named/named.conf -u bind"
> 
> and all my zone files and pid files etc are in /usr/local/etc/named.

I do this as well, though I have one extra wrinkle: /usr/local/etc/named
is a RO NFS mount.

How does chroot and NFS interact?

-T


-- 
Page 6: Unix is easy to use, but difficult to learn.
	- Harley Hahn, _The Unix Companion_



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040930153801.GP35869>