Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 4 Apr 2006 11:42:26 +0100
From:      Shaun Amott <shaun@inerd.com>
To:        "[LoN]Kamikaze" <LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: portscout - new distfile scanner
Message-ID:  <20060404104226.GD751@picobyte.net>
In-Reply-To: <44324AD3.8070809@gmx.de>
References:  <20060403190532.GA966@picobyte.net> <20060404094549.GA751@picobyte.net> <44324AD3.8070809@gmx.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 12:30:43PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> 
> > Someone noted that portscout found 0.811 as a update for 0.9 --
> > unfortunately, when I tried to account for weird versions like this
> > before, it didn't work out well at all. So, for now, portscout assumes
> > version numbers count up.
> 
> Which would be correct according to the porters handbook. So this is an
> error in the port, because the number should be 0.8.11 or portepoch
> needs to be increased.
> 

The version string used is from the port's DISTNAME or DISTVERSION
values; the version in ports format is not much use, unfortunately -
which means portscout has to deal with all the weird and wonderful
schemes vendors come up with.

-- 
Shaun Amott [ PGP: 0x6B387A9A ]
    Scientia Est Potentia.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060404104226.GD751>