From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 21:24:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A7416A422 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:24:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE06C43D60 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:24:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t12so597151wxc for ; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 13:24:35 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kNUxb+2eK7hb2AtSWMcxlPROZm8D9Yf5q4Z/rY0YmazC6E0KY5CEoO9g7cKD5prabUYuy2LdKlJMn6KJ5b5qe1ZIkUK8WqT0uaXvffACJyQtk3vUTvkRO+dMKe03aGdHT63EwEV8xgKhKzgLabJiFoMUJhtYGyyMIGV4Qfc7D9s= Received: by 10.70.33.3 with SMTP id g3mr3802939wxg; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 13:24:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.57.17 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 13:24:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 15:24:34 -0600 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <44u0bevneq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <44u0bevneq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Subject: Re: Why does portsdb -Uu run so long? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:24:37 -0000 On 04 Feb 2006 16:12:29 -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Nikolas Britton writes: > > > No, If I remember right (someone step in if I'm wrong) make fetchindex > > is what you would get if you ran portsdb -Uu. > > Assuming nothing has been checked in between (1) the building of the > index on the server (which you get from fetchindex), and (2) the last > snapshot of the ports tree that your cvsup server has taken. In > general, these will not be exactly the same, but close enough that the > difference hardly ever matters. portsdb -Uu runs make index which is some disastrously slow text processing (can make replace groff and sed and awk? should it?). portsnap is the white belt you can type. -- --