Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 30 Sep 1999 22:06:27 +0200
From:      Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>
To:        chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to dialups
Message-ID:  <19990930220627.A62609@keltia.freenix.fr>
In-Reply-To: <199909242140.OAA26254@usr05.primenet.com>
References:  <4.2.0.58.19990924144336.04490ba0@localhost> <199909242140.OAA26254@usr05.primenet.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to Terry Lambert:
> stateless autoconfiguration mechanism.  This is acceptable for
> IPv4, since link.local is defined to be non-routable; however,
> in IPv6, stateless autoconfiguration results in a routable
> address.  THIS WAS AN INTENDED IPv6 DESIGN GOAL.

So what? ISP would make their mail server on one prefix (in IPv6 terms) and
the dialups on another one. That way, you could put the dialups prefix in the
DUL/v6.

I don't see much of a problem. 
-- 
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr
FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 4.0-CURRENT #74: Thu Sep  9 00:20:51 CEST 1999



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990930220627.A62609>