From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 12 06:21:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FBBC16A4CE for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2004 06:21:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 027F543D1F for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2004 06:21:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 585F9148D9; Sun, 12 Dec 2004 00:21:34 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 00:21:34 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Sam Lawrance In-Reply-To: <41BBE0C2.8010603@brooknet.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reorganising the porter's handbook X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 06:21:35 -0000 On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, Sam Lawrance wrote: > Is this good? Not so good? Anybody working or thinking similarly? Thinking similarly but long ago ran out of time. I'd be happy to review any changes. Well, in a week or so :-) mcl