From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Feb 9 1: 4:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.213.49]) by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33CF94419; Tue, 8 Feb 2000 22:47:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from tom (helo=localhost) by misery.sdf.com with local-esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 12IQra-0002Gk-00; Tue, 8 Feb 2000 22:44:34 -0800 Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 22:44:33 -0800 (PST) From: Tom To: Jonathan & Charmane Frazier Cc: "Jonathan E. Lyons" , "Jonathan C. Frazier" , Stanley Hopcroft , FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD-ISP@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Performance of FreeBSD and MS Windows. What about select() andmemorymanagement etc ? In-Reply-To: <38A10370.E2250D1D@lonetree.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Jonathan & Charmane Frazier wrote: > Nope, I am correct. Microsoft used Redhat for a long time for their web servers > also, not just hotmail. I'm not sure what they are running now, but you used to be > able to go to linus.microsoft.com and see the redhat/apache "successful > installation" page. I found it quite amusing to say the least. Solaris is being > used exclusively on hotmail, NT couldn't handle it. No you are wrong. Just because there is a Linux install somewhere within *.microsoft.com means very little. www.microsoft.com is NT, and always has been NT. That is a known fact. hotmail is not exclusively Solaris. They use a FreeBSD and Solaris mix. This is well known too, and Microsoft has stated this publicly several times. Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message