Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:14:07 +0200 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CARP in RELENG_4 Message-ID: <200410111214.14779.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <002001c4aeb5$2c3bd9d0$0201a8c0@deze.org> References: <002001c4aeb5$2c3bd9d0$0201a8c0@deze.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1272398.Kxa4zORlv8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 10 October 2004 12:37, Frank wrote: > Hi, > > I'm thinking about using the CARP patchset > > http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/CARP/20040823-carp.RELENG_5.diff > > and porting it back to RELENG_4. > > Before I start doing that, I want to check first, if this is an > accomplishable goal. So, my question is, does anybody know a reason (eg. > major incompatibility beteen FreeBSD 4.x and FreeBSD 5.x) that makes this > task difficult or even impossible? Or can this be done easily enough???? You will certainly have some API gaps to fill. Some will be very obvious (a= s=20 you will just hit undefined functions) some will be more disturbing as=20 functions may act differently. All in all it should be doable. Yet with a=20 certain amount of work. That said, I don't see the point. RELENG_4 is past now, hail to RELENG_5 :-) =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart1272398.Kxa4zORlv8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBalz2XyyEoT62BG0RAoHuAJsHurYpFv5ZvKOblva3HoTRsilZEQCeLcmG C+2qkQ+VjL4ArqB1VRE1pfI= =9nHN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1272398.Kxa4zORlv8--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200410111214.14779.max>