From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Oct 20 19:58:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B1E37B401 for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 19:58:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chivas.oneill.dhs.org (chivas.oneill.dhs.org [65.65.85.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC64243E42 for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 19:58:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sean@seanoneill.info) Received: from v812r.seanoneill.info (dhcp1.NONROUTABLE [192.168.2.1]) by chivas.oneill.dhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 565D0766C for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:58:45 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20021020215759.00ac5dc8@postoffice.swbell.net> X-Sender: swoneill@postoffice.swbell.net (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:58:44 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Sean O'Neill Subject: Anybody notice ping -t switch doesn't appear to do what its supposed to in 4.6.2Rp2 ? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ping -t switch appears to do exactly with -c switch does. I looked in the Bugs repos and I didn't see anything on this. Anyone else notice this ? -- ........................................................ ......... ..- -. .. -..- .-. ..- .-.. . ... ............ .-- .. -. -... .-.. --- .-- ... -.. .-. --- --- .-.. ... Sean O'Neill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message