Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 14:22:38 GMT From: Salvo Bartolotta <bartequi@inwind.it> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: stork@QNET.COM, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unix 2000... Message-ID: <20000929.14223800@bartequi.ottodomain.org> In-Reply-To: <xzp7l7v9wvi.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <Pine.BSI.4.05L.10009290255390.28516-100000@cello.qnet.com> <20000929.13432900@bartequi.ottodomain.org> <xzp7l7v9wvi.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< On 9/29/00, 2:00:01 PM, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> wrote=20 regarding Re: Unix 2000...: > Salvo Bartolotta <bartequi@inwind.it> writes: > > I seem to understand that the process is far from completion. The > > difficulties on the part of M$ clearly show that NT is decidedly not= > > the right tool for the job. If they are bent on wasting time (and > > money) on this project, then so be it. > AFAIK, they're transitioning to Windows 2000, not NT. NT5 or Windows 2000 does not make much difference as to the final=20 result, does it ? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000929.14223800>