Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 14:03:24 -0400 From: Jerry <jerry@seibercom.net> To: FreeBSD FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Microsoft Now OpenBSD Foundation Gold Contributor Message-ID: <20150710140324.362fd648@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <33650.128.135.70.2.1436549147.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> References: <BLU437-SMTP2B8F14BE7B4D30D13EC96809F0@phx.gbl> <559FF775.7030204@mgm51.com> <33650.128.135.70.2.1436549147.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:25:47 -0500 (CDT), Valeri Galtsev stated: > On Fri, July 10, 2015 11:48 am, Mike wrote: > > On 7/10/2015 12:43 PM, Carmel NY wrote: > >> I wonder why they choose OpenBSD over FreeBSD? > >> > >> http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20150708134520&mode=expanded&count=27 > > > > Probably is related to: > > > > http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20150603090420 > > With all my scepticism I would more consider that as an excuse, implying > the reason may be something like this: > > http://slashdot.org/story/10/12/15/004235/FBI-Alleged-To-Have-Backdoored-OpenBSDs-IPSEC-Stack > > (I didn't say exactly this, I said something like this...) So, I'm > actually quite happy they didn't choose FreeBSD ;-) Sorry but that is impossible. Many eyes makes FOSS software invulnerable to this sort of attack? Or, at least that is what fools like to believe. Say any lie enough times and some moron will believe it. -- Jerry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150710140324.362fd648>