From owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org  Fri Aug 11 21:47:38 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F61DDC8F1F;
 Fri, 11 Aug 2017 21:47:38 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from marquis@roble.com)
Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [209.237.23.5])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FBFE65D19;
 Fri, 11 Aug 2017 21:47:37 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from marquis@roble.com)
Received: from roble.com (roble.com [209.237.23.50])
 by mx5.roble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C8E43D04E;
 Fri, 11 Aug 2017 14:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 14:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com>
To: Remko Lodder <remko@FreeBSD.org>
cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: pkg audit false negatives
In-Reply-To: <D12FD70B-2F2B-4895-AB9D-1BD72F8512B6@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <nycvar.OFS.7.76.1708111441430.53156@eboyr.pbz>
References: <nycvar.OFS.7.76.1708101931090.13252@eboyr.pbz>
 <C540BA50-5F06-4F99-A575-D27347A3F527@FreeBSD.org>
 <D12FD70B-2F2B-4895-AB9D-1BD72F8512B6@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion
 <freebsd-pkg.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-pkg>,
 <mailto:freebsd-pkg-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pkg/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-pkg-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pkg>,
 <mailto:freebsd-pkg-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 21:47:38 -0000

> It had been resolved for dovecot (it will now match both variants, since people might still have
> the old variant of the port installed) and there is a new paragraph added to the porters handbook
> which tells that we need to have a look at the vuxml entries.

Thanks Remko.

> Hope this solves your issue,

It may for renamed ports/pkgs but doesn't appear to for deprecations.
Once ports are dropped they do not show up in pkg-audit despite having
been installed via pkg and/or ports.  That's the false negative that
appears to still be a problem.

Roger