Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 4 Apr 2011 09:14:59 -0600
From:      Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com>
To:        FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: am i back up....???
Message-ID:  <20110404151459.GA99678@guilt.hydra>
In-Reply-To: <4D99922E.2070301@qeng-ho.org>
References:  <20110402201441.GA2996@thought.org> <AANLkTinrWgDx6Gm4V6t+Cjkr+Dx6zbamh-ASZZT+HDON@mail.gmail.com> <20110402234643.GD4792@thought.org> <7C870049-A789-4AD0-97FF-9BBC581CCBD0@d3photography.com> <20110403013059.GB18031@thought.org> <20110403034359.7ac8d116.freebsd@edvax.de> <20110403154626.GD92121@guilt.hydra> <20110404013750.a3bcee50.freebsd@edvax.de> <20110404001548.GA96327@guilt.hydra> <4D99922E.2070301@qeng-ho.org>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help

--X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 10:41:02AM +0100, Arthur Chance wrote:
>=20
> In the near future I'm probably going to have to implement a web mail=20
> system for times when my clients are travelling and don't have access to=
=20
> an IMAP capable client. If Roundcube isn't a decent solution, what is?

I'm afraid I'm not very well versed in the nuances of Webmail software.
I just know that receiving emails formatted by code that was apparently
written by prairie dogs (judging by how it screws up the formatting) is
suboptimal.

--=20
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]

--X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk2Z4HMACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKUARQCeOhk1kaf5DSk9YcSYHrrmen6D
QpAAoLkQAOd1psBdGbZJvD9z1k+ylCo7
=zRE/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110404151459.GA99678>