Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      05 Jun 1999 22:28:56 -0500
From:      Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.org>
To:        Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Cc:        <kip@lyris.com>, Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>, Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, Matthew Hunt <mph@astro.caltech.edu>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: net.inet.tcp.always_keepalive on as default ?
Message-ID:  <86pv3ac8hz.fsf@detlev.UUCP>
In-Reply-To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav's message of "02 Jun 1999 19:34:41 %2B0200"
References:  <Pine.SOL.4.05.9906011329260.6477-100000@luna> <xzpbtey4iby.fsf@localhost.ping.uio.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I don't know what's worse; that Microsoft themselves can't keep
> Windows running for 50 days, or that they're incapable of manually
> bumping the counter to a value close to UINT_MAX and wait a few
> minutes for it to roll over.

What's worst is probably that the bug doesn't affect operation.
Nobody I've talked to has ever seen a Windows 95 machine stay up for
over a week or so, let alone a month.

joelh

-- 
Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org
   Fourth law of programming:
   Anything that can go wrong wi
sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86pv3ac8hz.fsf>