From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 20 21:41:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE0BB1065673 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 21:41:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586F48FC08 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 21:41:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mBKLfDhi010313; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:41:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id mBKLfDmC010310; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:41:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:41:13 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Lowell Gilbert In-Reply-To: <448wqazfyf.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Message-ID: <20081220224016.S10302@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <1229788709.1583.16.camel@MGW_1> <44iqpezlb8.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20081220205414.A10042@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <448wqazfyf.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Network Stack Code Re-write (Possible motivations...?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 21:41:54 -0000 >>> I very much doubt that marketing issues were a significant issue. >>> Off-the-shelf OS networking has always fallen short of supporting >> >> it wasn't made for that. > > It can be. I've written portable IP stacks intended for exactly this Of course it can. i just write that FreeBSD network stack WASN'T MADE for that. not if it can or not. >> routing ASIC's and put them there! > > Mostly, yes. But the system still has to be network manageable. That > requires that it send and receive packets. Doing so requires using the > same routing information that the forwarding engines are using to > forward packets in the same address space. The kernel *does* still need > to know routes to any of its destinations. but kernel doesn't forward much packets.